Skip to content

6 min read

Marine Le Pen's dediabolisation rebrand of the Front National (2007-2017)

Summary

Ded iabolisation (lit. ‘de-demonisation’) is a term used in French politics to describe the normalisation of the National Rally (RN), a far-right party formerly known as the National Front (FN), since the late 1980s. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] Under Marine Le Pen, who became FN leader in 2011, the strategy relied on narrative re-framing (the explicit “dédiabolisation” plank, the 2018 party-name change) and on coalition extension into the centre-right (defections from the centre-right, the election of RN MPs to National Assembly vice-presidencies, normalised media presence). [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] Reception is sharply mixed: one historian calls the strategy “largely a success”, another academic calls the term “misleading” PR that leaves the party’s values unchanged, and a third describes a “polished, media savvy focus on eradicating any overt racism” that keeps the underlying anti-Muslim orientation intact. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Tactics used

  • narrative re-framing centred on an explicit “dédiabolisation” plank under Marine Le Pen from 2011 onward [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • targeted member expulsions to purify the party’s public-facing line, including the expulsion of openly pro-Vichy France members and the removal of Jean-Marie Le Pen, the party’s founder [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • institutional rebranding, including the 2018 name change from Front National to National Rally [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • coalition extension into the centre-right, evidenced by centre-right politicians defecting to the RN and by the election of RN MPs as vice-presidents of the National Assembly [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • sustained presence in mainstream media programmes alongside a documented softening of media descriptions of the RN as “far-right” [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Background

The term dédiabolisation was coined by journalist Olivier Biffaud in a 1989 article in Le Monde, in which he wrote that “the National Front has been ‘demonised’ [diabolisé] for several years. It is now undertaking its dédiabolisation” and that this was “the message that the leaders of the far-right movement have been trying to get across to their cadres since the start of the summer university they are holding in La Baule”. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] The term therefore predates Marine Le Pen’s leadership by more than two decades; the FN/RN had been attempting to push back against its “diabolised” image in French politics since at least the late 1980s. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Under Jean-Marie Le Pen the party had been repeatedly described as “far-right” in academic, journalistic, and political discourse, and as a result attracted the kind of cordon sanitaire by mainstream parties and media that the eventual rebrand sought to dismantle. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

What happened

Upon assuming the FN leadership in 2011, Marine Le Pen made dédiabolisation a key plank of her leadership, particularly by expelling openly pro-Vichy France members from the party, including her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, and by changing the party’s name in 2018. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] The strategy was anchored in concrete, visible signals: a public break with the party’s historical founder, a name change, and a rhetoric of normalisation. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

The term was first entered into the Larousse Dictionary in 2015, a development in itself treated in the Wikipedia article as a marker of the strategy’s cultural reach. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] Dédiabolisation has continued into the 2020s, as the RN began to compete for the largest party in French politics; this latest phase has included the election of 28-year-old Jordan Bardella as party president in 2022 and with Le Pen distancing herself from Éric Zemmour in the 2022 French presidential election. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Reception

The scholarly reception recorded in the Wikipedia article is genuinely divided, which is the reason this case study carries outcome: mixed rather than a unidirectional verdict.

Historian Andrew Hussey said that dédiabolisation has “largely been a success” for the RN, adding that “a new generation has emerged … which doesn’t care about the RN’s murky past – which is well beyond their lifetime anyway – and who will be very soon be shaping the future of France.” [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Robert Zaretsky of the University of Houston called the term “misleading”, saying that it was “a public relations effort to change the public’s view of the party” instead of a change in the party’s values. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Itay Lotem of the University of Westminster described the strategy as keeping the traditional FN “strategy of channelling nationalistic, anti-Muslim sentiment” but with a “polished, media savvy focus on eradicating any overt racism”. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Safia Dahani of the Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne stated that established political institutions and media have played key roles in dédiabolisation, pointing towards centre-right politicians who have defected to the RN, the election of RN MPs as vice-presidents of the National Assembly, and the frequency with which RN figures have been invited to participate in media programmes, while the media has at the same time softened its descriptions of the RN as far-right. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

These four positions, two affirmative and two critical, are why a single outcome label cannot capture the reception in the source: the same evidence (defections, vice-presidencies, dictionary entry, media normalisation) underwrites a “success” verdict in Hussey’s framing and a “PR not values” verdict in Zaretsky’s framing. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Outcome

Verdict: mixed.

Two measurable mainstreaming signals are documented in the source: the entry of dédiabolisation into the Larousse Dictionary in 2015 and the institutional integration signalled by centre-right defections and by RN MPs being elected as vice-presidents of the National Assembly. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] Against those, the source records substantive academic criticism that the same institutional passage did not change the party’s underlying ideological content, characterised as a “public relations effort” (Zaretsky) and as a “polished” repackaging of an unchanged “strategy of channelling nationalistic, anti-Muslim sentiment” (Lotem). [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017] Because the source itself documents both the measurable mainstreaming and a divided specialist verdict on what that mainstreaming represents, the outcome is recorded as mixed rather than won or partial; a future source that added hard vote-share or polling data could change that label without changing the underlying events. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Lessons

  • A long-running rebrand of a stigmatised party can plausibly win dictionary recognition, defections from rival parties, and senior institutional posts while a parallel specialist debate questions whether underlying positions have actually shifted. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • Targeted expulsion of a founding figure by name — here, Jean-Marie Le Pen — can serve as a single, legible signal of strategic reorientation toward a broader electorate. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • Reception evidence must distinguish between measurable mainstreaming (institutional posts, centre-right defections, dictionary entry, softened media descriptions) and unchanged ideological content; the four scholarly positions in the Reception section above show that the same evidence base can support both “success” and “PR” verdicts. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]
  • External institutions and media tend to participate in the legitimating half of the strategy, even when subject-matter specialists contest the factual basis of the legitimating framing. [source: french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017]

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft (long-running rebranding under hostile framing), not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • french-le-pen-dediabolisation-rebrand-of-front-national-2007-2017 — grounding: primary — license: cc-attribution
  • Rewritten: 2026-07-15 via rw2-q6 batch.

Learn more

Last verified: 2026-07-15