Skip to content

4 min read

Uzbeks campaign for economic rights and release of prisoners (Andijan), 2005

Summary

In June 2004 Uzbek police arrested 23 Muslim businessmen in Andijan for alleged ties to the Akramia group; from January 2005, thousands of their supporters gathered in Babur Square outside the courthouse to demand their release and protest the poor economic conditions in the Ferghana Valley. [source: nv-database] On the morning of 13 May 2005, after unidentified armed men stormed the jail and freed the businessmen, between 10,000 and 15,000 protesters filled Babur Square; without warning, army and police opened fire on the largely unarmed crowd, with the death toll estimated between 300 and 5,000. [source: nv-database] None of the protesters’ demands were achieved, and the Andijan massacre ended the campaign. [source: nv-database]

Tactics used

Background

Following the 1999 Tashkent bombings, the Uzbek government cracked down on Muslims and made it much harder for them to operate businesses; the 23 Andijan businessmen had avoided the crackdown by sharing capital and running successful firms that paid higher wages than other local employers, giving them significant community support. [source: nv-database] After their June 2004 arrest on charges of belonging to Akramia, thousands of demonstrators — many of whom had lost jobs because of the business leaders’ detention — campaigned for their release and against the Ferghana Valley’s economic decline. [source: nv-database]

What happened

From January 2005, locals gathered in small groups in Babur Square, holding signs and chanting in an organised, non-confrontational manner to pressure the authorities into releasing the businessmen. [source: nv-database] On 25 April, the detained businessmen announced a hunger strike to protest the judge’s conduct. [source: nv-database] On 10 May, 1,000 people gathered in front of the courthouse; on 11 May a larger crowd arrived, and the court delayed the verdict indefinitely. [source: nv-database] On 11-12 May, police detained several relatives of the already-detained businessmen. [source: nv-database] In the early morning of 13 May, unidentified men seized weapons from an army unit and stormed the Andijan jail, freeing the businessmen and killing several guards; the freed prisoners and armed civilians who took a government building moved to Babur Square, where thousands more protesters and a smaller group of armed militants were already gathered. [source: nv-database] By the afternoon, 10,000-15,000 people filled Babur Square; microphones were set up and speakers denounced poverty and injustice, and many prayed at the nearby mosque. [source: nv-database] Without warning, army and police opened fire on the largely unarmed crowd, forcing protesters out of the square; some placed hostages in front of them as human shields, but many hostages and demonstrators were killed, and a small portion of the crowd crossed the border to Kyrgyzstan. [source: nv-database] Various sources place the death toll between 300 and 5,000. [source: nv-database]

Key people & organizations

  • President Islam Karimov (President of Uzbekistan, opponent) [source: nv-database]
  • The 23 detained Andijan businessmen (Muslim entrepreneurs, hunger strikers in jail) [source: nv-database]
  • Akramia (alleged Islamic group, named in the charges) [source: nv-database]
  • Babur Square protesters (Andijan residents, many former employees of the businessmen) [source: nv-database]
  • Unidentified armed men who stormed the jail [source: nv-database]
  • Uzbek army, police, judiciary (opponents) [source: nv-database]

Outcome

Verdict: lost.

The campaign ended in the 13 May 2005 Andijan massacre; none of the protesters’ demands were met, and Human Rights Watch documented the killings. [source: nv-database] Per the source’s scoring rubric, the campaign scored 0 out of 6 points on achieving specific demands/goals, 0 out of 1 on survival, and 3 out of 3 on growth (3 out of 10 total). [source: nv-database] The presence of even a small armed minority among the protesters was enough to justify a lethal government response against the entire crowd. [source: nv-database]

Lessons

  • Mixed-method movements are uniquely vulnerable: a tiny armed faction can be used as a pretext for a regime to crush an overwhelmingly peaceful crowd [source: nv-database]
  • Sustained, well-organised nonviolent pressure (months of orderly Babur Square protests) can be wiped out in a single afternoon if there is no protective international presence or escalation pathway beyond the square [source: nv-database]
  • Authoritarian regimes that classify economic protest as religious extremism (the Akramia label) make it almost impossible for organisers to negotiate; the framing forecloses political compromise [source: nv-database]

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-07-04 via t6_build.py

Last verified: 2026-07-09