Skip to content

3 min read

Refusal to Accept Appointed Officials

Summary

Refusing to recognise or cooperate with officials appointed by an opponent — Sharp’s method 131 (Refusal to accept appointed officials), one of the 198 Methods of Nonviolent Action, classified under the Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government subcategory of political noncooperation [source: commons-198-methods].

Body

Gene Sharp’s 198 Methods of Nonviolent Action catalogues method 131 as Refusal to accept appointed officials, classified under Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government in the political noncooperation category, alongside adjacent entries such as Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents (129), Removal of own signs and placemarks (130) and Refusal to dissolve existing institutions (132) [source: commons-198-methods].

The method is one of the canonical tactics of dual-power or parallel-government campaigns: a population refuses to recognise an opponent’s appointee as a legitimate official — by refusing to pay taxes to them, by refusing to attend their courts, by refusing to enrol children in their schools, by transferring public functions to a parallel structure. Sharp’s pairing with method 132 (Refusal to dissolve existing institutions) shows the dual face: the campaign both refuses to recognise the new authority and preserves the institutions the new authority wants to dismantle.

Worked examples

See methods-of-nonviolent-action for the broader method library.

FAQ

What is refusal to accept appointed officials?

Refusal to accept appointed officials is Sharp’s method 131 in the 198 Methods of Nonviolent Action — refusing to recognise or cooperate with officials appointed by an opponent. It sits under Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government in the political noncooperation category, alongside Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents (129), Removal of own signs and placemarks (130), and Refusal to dissolve existing institutions (132) [source: commons-198-methods]. The method is one of the canonical tactics of dual-power or parallel-government campaigns.

How does the tactic work operationally?

A population refuses to recognise an opponent’s appointee as a legitimate official — by refusing to pay taxes to them, refusing to attend their courts, refusing to enrol children in their schools, and transferring public functions to a parallel structure. Sharp’s pairing with method 132 shows the dual face: the campaign both refuses to recognise the new authority and preserves the institutions the new authority wants to dismantle [source: commons-198-methods].

Which historical campaigns illustrate the method?

Two worked examples anchor the method. The 1988–1993 Guatemalan civil-patrol refusal campaign saw a population refusing the appointees of the state’s counter-insurgency apparatus [source: commons-198-methods]. The Czechoslovak post-1968 resistance ran a selective noncooperation with Soviet-installed officials, a worked example of refusal-to-accept-appointed-officials in an occupied-state context.

Where does the method sit in the broader Sharp taxonomy?

The method sits inside the political noncooperation category, in the Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government subcategory. The adjacent entries in the same subcategory frame the broader refusal — refusal of assistance to enforcement agents (129), removal of own signs and placemarks (130), refusal to dissolve existing institutions (132) [source: commons-198-methods]. Together these methods describe a population’s systematic withdrawal of cooperation from an opponent’s government while building parallel institutions the opponent cannot dismantle.

Learn more

Last verified: 2026-07-09